Sunday, November 29, 2009

YOU'LL NEVER BEAT THE IRISH


I OWE I OWE IT'S LOOKING FOR WORK WE GO





The external debt of a country is defined as the "total public and private debt owed to nonresidents repayable in foreign currency, goods, or services", where the public debt is the money or credit owed by any level of government, from central to local, and the private debt the money or credit owed by private households or private corporations based in the country under consideration.
The debt per capita in a country is defined as the total debt of that country divided by its population.

 How does the Irish debt position compare to that of other countries? 


In at 20. is the USA
External debt (as % of GDP): 94.3%
External debt per capita: $43,793

Gross external debt: $13.454 trillion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $14.26 trillion




19. Hungary
External debt (as % of GDP): 105.7%
External debt per capita: $20,990

Gross external debt: $207.92 billion (2009 Q1)
2008 GDP (est): $196.6 billion




18. Australia
External debt (as % of GDP): 111.3%
External debt per capita: $41,916

Gross external debt: $891.26 billion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $800.2 billion




17. Italy
External debt (as % of GDP): 126.7%
External debt per capita: $39,741

Gross external debt: $2.310 trillion (2009 Q1)
2008 GDP (est): $ 1.823 trillion




16. Greece
External debt (as % of GDP): 161.1%
External debt per capita: $51,483

Gross external debt: $552.8 billion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $343 billion




15. Spain
External debt (as % of GDP): 171.7%
External debt per capita: $59,457

Gross external debt: $2.409 trillion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $1.403 trillion




14. Germany
External debt (as % of GDP): 178.5%
External debt per capita: $63,263

Gross external debt: $5.208 trillion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $2.918 trillion





13. Finland
External debt (as % of GDP): 188.5%
External debt per capita: $69,491

Gross external debt: $364.85 billion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $193.5 billion





12. Sweden
External debt (as % of GDP): 194.3%
External debt per capita: $73,854

Gross external debt: $669.1 billion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $344.3 billion





11. Norway
External debt (as % of GDP): 199%
External debt per capita: $117,604

Gross external debt: $548.1 billion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $275.4 billion




10. Hong Kong
External debt (as % of GDP): 205.8%
External debt per capita: $89,457

Gross external debt: $631.13 billion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $306.6 billion





9. Portugal
External debt (as % of GDP): 214.4%
External debt per capita: $47,348

Gross external debt: $507 billion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $236.5 billion





8. France
External debt (as % of GDP): 236%
External debt per capita: $78,387

Gross external debt: $5.021 trillion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $2.128 trillion





7. Austria
External debt (as % of GDP): 252.6%
External debt per capita: $101,387

Gross external debt: $832.42 billion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $329.5 billion





6. Denmark
External debt (as % of GDP): 298.3%
External debt per capita: $110,422

Gross external debt: $607.38 billion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $203.6 billion





5. Belgium
External debt (as % of GDP): 320.2%
External debt per capita : $119,681

Gross external debt: $1.246 trillion (2009 Q1)
2008 GDP (est): $389 billion





4. Netherlands
External debt (as % of GDP): 365%
External debt per capita: $146,703

Gross external debt: $2.452 trillion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $672 billion





3. United Kingdom
External debt (as % of GDP): 408.3%
External debt per capita: $148,702

Gross external debt: $9.087 trillion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $2.226 trillion





2. Switzerland
External debt (as % of GDP): 422.7%
External debt per capita: $176,045

Gross external debt: $1.338 trillion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $316.7 billion





Ole Ole Ole Ole Ole Ole
 
YOU'LL NEVER BEAT THE IRISH

1. Ireland
External debt (as % of GDP): 1,267%
External debt per capita: $567,805

Gross external debt: $2.386 trillion (2009 Q2)
2008 GDP (est): $188.4 billion

YEP 1,267%
 




We're green with envy















Thursday, November 19, 2009

Banking Expert Peter Mathews on fixing Ireland's Banking Crisis




Ireland's Banking Crisis


  click on the headline to view his page. Take a look at his videos too



Wednesday, November 18, 2009

THE END OF THE WORLD

Société Générale has advised clients to be ready for a possible "global economic collapse" over the next two years, mapping a strategy of defensive investments to avoid wealth destruction.

 
A bullet train speeding past Mount Fuji in Fuji city, west of Tokyo, Japan
Explosion of debt: Japan's public debt could reach as much as 270pc of GDP in the next two years. A bullet train is pictured speeding past Mount Fuji in Fuji city, west of Tokyo Photo: Reuters
In a report entitled "Worst-case debt scenario", the bank's asset team said state rescue packages over the last year have merely transferred private liabilities onto sagging sovereign shoulders, creating a fresh set of problems.
Overall debt is still far too high in almost all rich economies as a share of GDP (350pc in the US), whether public or private. It must be reduced by the hard slog of "deleveraging", for years.
"As yet, nobody can say with any certainty whether we have in fact escaped the prospect of a global economic collapse," said the 68-page report, headed by asset chief Daniel Fermon. It is an exploration of the dangers, not a forecast.
Under the French bank's "Bear Case" scenario, the dollar would slide further and global equities would retest the March lows. Property prices would tumble again. Oil would fall back to $50 in 2010.
Governments have already shot their fiscal bolts. Even without fresh spending, public debt would explode within two years to 105pc of GDP in the UK, 125pc in the US and the eurozone, and 270pc in Japan. Worldwide state debt would reach $45 trillion, up two-and-a-half times in a decade.
(UK figures look low because debt started from a low base. Mr Ferman said the UK would converge with Europe at 130pc of GDP by 2015 under the bear case).
The underlying debt burden is greater than it was after the Second World War, when nominal levels looked similar. Ageing populations will make it harder to erode debt through growth. "High public debt looks entirely unsustainable in the long run. We have almost reached a point of no return for government debt," it said.
Inflating debt away might be seen by some governments as a lesser of evils.
If so, gold would go "up, and up, and up" as the only safe haven from fiat paper money. Private debt is also crippling. Even if the US savings rate stabilises at 7pc, and all of it is used to pay down debt, it will still take nine years for households to reduce debt/income ratios to the safe levels of the 1980s.
The bank said the current crisis displays "compelling similarities" with Japan during its Lost Decade (or two), with a big difference: Japan was able to stay afloat by exporting into a robust global economy and by letting the yen fall. It is not possible for half the world to pursue this strategy at the same time.
SocGen advises bears to sell the dollar and to "short" cyclical equities such as technology, auto, and travel to avoid being caught in the "inherent deflationary spiral". Emerging markets would not be spared. Paradoxically, they are more leveraged to the US growth than Wall Street itself. Farm commodities would hold up well, led by sugar.
Mr Fermon said junk bonds would lose 31pc of their value in 2010 alone. However, sovereign bonds would "generate turbo-charged returns" mimicking the secular slide in yields seen in Japan as the slump ground on. At one point Japan's 10-year yield dropped to 0.40pc. The Fed would hold down yields by purchasing more bonds. The European Central Bank would do less, for political reasons.
SocGen's case for buying sovereign bonds is controversial. A number of funds doubt whether the Japan scenario will be repeated, not least because Tokyo itself may be on the cusp of a debt compound crisis.
Mr Fermon said his report had electrified clients on both sides of the Atlantic. "Everybody wants to know what the impact will be. A lot of hedge funds and bankers are worried," he said.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

WTF

AM I SEEING THIS RIGHT


                                                       DOW 10437 S&P 1110 NASDAQ 2203



What a laugh 








Yesterday, Meredith Whitney went on CNBC and said she hasn't been this bearish in a year. I AM IN THAT CAMP BIG TIME




Nouriel Roubini says that the "worst is yet to come" and that "the damage will be extensive and severe unless bold policy action is undertaken now." I BELIEVE THIS TO BE TRUE TOO.


Meredith Whitney

 




Cut and paste this address to your address bar or click on the headline WTF to this story



http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1332936523&play=1










Nouriel Roubini














The worst is yet to come: Unemployed Americans should hunker down for more job losses

Think the worst is over? Wrong. Conditions in the U.S. labor markets are awful and worsening. While the official unemployment rate is already 10.2% and another 200,000 jobs were lost in October, when you include discouraged workers and partially employed workers the figure is a whopping 17.5%.
While losing 200,000 jobs per month is better than the 700,000 jobs lost in January, current job losses still average more than the per month rate of 150,000 during the last recession.
Also, remember: The last recession ended in November 2001, but job losses continued for more than a year and half until June of 2003; ditto for the 1990-91 recession.
So we can expect that job losses will continue until the end of 2010 at the earliest. In other words, if you are unemployed and looking for work and just waiting for the economy to turn the corner, you had better hunker down. All the economic numbers suggest this will take a while. The jobs just are not coming back.
There's really just one hope for our leaders to turn things around: a bold prescription that increases the fiscal stimulus with another round of labor-intensive, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, helps fiscally strapped state and local governments and provides a temporary tax credit to the private sector to hire more workers. Helping the unemployed just by extending unemployment benefits is necessary not sufficient; it leads to persistent unemployment rather than job creation.
The long-term picture for workers and families is even worse than current job loss numbers alone would suggest. Now as a way of sharing the pain, many firms are telling their workers to cut hours, take furloughs and accept lower wages. Specifically, that fall in hours worked is equivalent to another 3 million full time jobs lost on top of the 7.5 million jobs formally lost.
This is very bad news but we must face facts. Many of the lost jobs are gone forever, including construction jobs, finance jobs and manufacturing jobs. Recent studies suggest that a quarter of U.S. jobs are fully out-sourceable over time to other countries.
Other measures tell the same ugly story: The average length of unemployment is at an all time high; the ratio of job applicants to vacancies is 6 to 1; initial claims are down but continued claims are very high and now millions of unemployed are resorting to the exceptional extended unemployment benefits programs and are staying in them longer.
Based on my best judgment, it is most likely that the unemployment rate will peak close to 11% and will remain at a very high level for two years or more.
The weakness in labor markets and the sharp fall in labor income ensure a weak recovery of private consumption and an anemic recovery of the economy, and increases the risk of a double dip recession.
As a result of these terribly weak labor markets, we can expect weak recovery of consumption and economic growth; larger budget deficits; greater delinquencies in residential and commercial real estate and greater fall in home and commercial real estate prices; greater losses for banks and financial institutions on residential and commercial real estate mortgages, and in credit cards, auto loans and student loans and thus a greater rate of failures of banks; and greater protectionist pressures.
The damage will be extensive and severe unless bold policy action is undertaken now.
Roubini is professor of Economics at the Stern School of Business at New York University and Chairman of Roubini Global Economics.
Top economic prognosticator says job seekers
must face grim economic facts

 

Also worth a listen 

 

The Herd  


Cut and paste if need be to youer address bar

 

http://www.calcalist.co.il/markets/articles/1,7340,L-3367458,00.html

 

Is that or is that not the backbone of the recovery.................... JOBS

I think I have said that this will not be a jobless recovery before and I'll say it again.


WITHOUT WORK NOTHING GETS GOING

They said it all for me


Friday, November 13, 2009

Zimbabwe: A Fresh Start

 All credit to By Alf Field    


In February 2009 Zimbabwe was the only country in the world without debt. Nobody owed anyone anything. Following the abandonment of the Zimbabwe Dollar as the local currency all local debt was wiped out and the country started with a clean slate.
It is now a country without a functioning Central Bank and without a local currency that can be produced at will at the behest of politicians. Since February 2009 there has been no lender of last resort in Zimbabwe, causing banks to be ultra cautious in their lending policies. The US Dollar is the de facto currency in use although the Euro, GB Pound and South African Rand are accepted in local transactions.
Price controls and foreign exchange regulations have been abandoned. Zimbabwe literally joined the real world at the stroke of a pen. Money now flows in and out of the country without restriction. Super market shelves, bare in January, are now bursting with products.
I recently visited Zimbabwe in the company of a leading Australian fund manager. As a student of monetary history, I was interested to see what had happened to a country that had suffered hyperinflation. How did the people cope? How is the country progressing now? The current Zimbabwean situation is complicated by the fact that President Robert Mugabe is determined to stay in power whatever the cost.
The first part of this article deals with economics, the hyperinflation and current situation, which is a picture of recovery and potential vigorous growth. The second part deals with politics, both the historical aspects as well as current developments, which are extremely fluid.
We were fortunate to have private interviews with the Prime Minister, Morgan Tsvangirai, and a wide range of business leaders. This provided a quick picture of Zimbabwe past and present.
There are common denominators in all hyperinflations. Generally government finances reach a point where large budget deficits cannot be financed by taxes or borrowings. The choices come down to austerity (with the government cutting back its spending) or by funding the deficit by creating local currency through the printing press, leading to the inflation tax. This is always a political decision, but the line of least resistance is the printing press. Cutting government expenditures and laying off bureaucratic staff is anathema to most politicians.

In Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe has made it his mission to remain President for life. This has caused him to infiltrate his supporters into the army and police force. He also used Government finances as a way of funding patronage. His use of the printing press was liberal and nobody was prepared to stand up against him. This eventually led to inflation gathering momentum to the point where the armed forces were getting rebellious – they wanted more money. When Mugabe caved in to these demands, the Zimbabwe Dollar plunged.

Shortly after Mugabe was elected President in 1980, the Zimbabwe Dollar was worth more than the US Dollar. The ongoing abuse of the financial system eventually produced a runaway inflation. The largest bank note issued in Zimbabwe was for One Hundred Trillion Dollars and is pictured below. These notes are now collector’s items and I had to part with US$2 to a street vendor to acquire the note depicted below.

The worst trauma for ordinary people during the hyperinflation was lack of food. This was due mainly to the imposition of price controls. If the cost of production of an item was $10 and the price controllers instructed that the item could only be sold for $5, the business would soon go bankrupt if they sold at the controlled price. The result was that production and imports just dried up, hence the empty shelves in the supermarkets.
People survived by shopping in neighboring countries and relied on assistance from South Africa and the aid agencies. Companies survived the hyperinflation with great difficulty and often by ignoring laws. Although companies were left without debt post February 2009, they were also left deficient in working capital and had dilapidated plant and equipment. Regular repairs and maintenance could not be afforded. Most companies now require urgent recapitalization.

There has been a major exodus of Zimbabweans over the years, estimated at about 3 million prior to 2008. Many of these were qualified people who were subjected to Mugabe’s campaign of terror. During the latter stages of the hyperinflation there was a further exodus because people were starving. Most of these people went south into South Africa. The current population of Zimbabwe is estimated to be between 10 and 12 million people, so the numbers that have fled the country are significant relative to the total population.
Current economic activity is strongly supported by remittances from Zimbabwean migrants to their families in Zimbabwe. Once the political situation settles down, it is likely that many of these migrants will wish to return to Zimbabwe. Some have already done so. Many activities that perished in the hyperinflation, such as insurance, are now starting to resuscitate.

Credit financing activities are starting to revive. Visa credit cards are once again operating successfully in Zimbabwe, others will surely follow. Banks have had both sides of their balance sheets devastated by hyperinflation and now have no lender of last resort to call on. They are understandably cautious in lending the deposits that are slowly filtering back into the system. Banks also lost much of their equity capital. Barclays Bank survived because it had 40 branches where the bank owned the real estate and had a strong parent. These properties plus some foreign currency holdings represent the equity capital on which the bank currently operates.

In a country with no debt, only assets, people and companies are under geared. With the ultra cautious lending policies of the banks, there is a huge opportunity for foreign investors in the credit purveying industry.
There has been a sharp rise in economic activity since February. Real wages have risen substantially compared to a year ago. Whatever workers were paid in Zimbabwe Dollars during the hyperinflation bought virtually nothing. Now even the minimum wage of around $100 per month allows for basic purchases. A 10kg bag of maize meal, a staple in the local diet, costs $3.50 and lasts for two weeks. Demand for products and services is increasing rapidly. Corporate profits are rising, leading to greater tax revenues for the Government, augmented by rising VAT taxes. Greater Government revenue allows for greater Government spending.
This self-reinforcing loop will continue. The improvement in the economy will become dramatic once Mugabe leaves the scene. At that time aid agencies, NGO’s, Charities and foreign governments will start injecting large volumes of funds and assistance into the country. They refuse to commit any meaningful funds while Mugabe is still the President.

With Mugabe out of the way and the economy recovering strongly, one could reasonably anticipate that a large proportion of the Zimbabweans living overseas will return to the country bringing welcome skills and capital.  Indeed foreigners will also be attracted to investing in the country in those circumstances.
It is fascinating to see how rapidly the economy is recovering. It is a great testament to what can be achieved in a free enterprise environment by the elimination of controls combined with the institution of new money that people trust. It needs to be money that their Government cannot create via the printing (or electronic) press.
The economic future of Zimbabwe is likely to be in mining, agriculture, tourism and service industries, especially those providing infrastructure and maintenance facilities. There remain many problems, not the least being chronic unemployment, but the future looks bright beyond the Mugabe horizon. The population is amongst the best educated in Africa and most people can speak English. With the Zimbabwe’s natural assets, there is scope for realistic optimism about the economic future, especially once the current political difficulties are overcome. The population has been brutally traumatized by the hyperinflation and the political situation. They really deserve a decent change of fortune.

THE POLITICAL SITUATION

To understand what has happened and is happening in Zimbabwe, it is necessary to look at some history. Modern Zimbabwean history began in 1890 with the arrival of the Pioneer Column of white settlers under Leander Starr Jameson at the behest of Cecil Rhodes. Initially they were searching for gold but when nothing of importance was found, they turned to pegging land for farms. The initial settlers were fortune hunters, grabbing land at every opportunity.
Prior to the arrival of the white settlers, the Shona tribe occupied the northern part of the country called Mashonaland, and the Ndebele tribe were ensconced in the south, called Matabeleland. In 1896 these tribes rebelled against white rule in one of the most violent episodes of resistance in the colonial era. In Matabeleland a somewhat dubious settlement was negotiated but in Mashonaland the Shona chiefs were hunted down until all resistance ceased. No Peace Treaty was ever signed with the Shona tribe.
The Shona, in particular, have never forgotten this. Mugabe, who is from the Shona tribe, has made it his life’s work to recover for his people the land that was “stolen” by the whites. He has repeated this statement on many occasions.
A book by Martin Meredith titled “MUGABE: Power, Plunder and the Struggle for Zimbabwe” published by Jonathan Ball, gives a very readable account of the recent history of Zimbabwe up to 2006, prior to the worst of the hyperinflation. It is required reading for anyone wishing to gain a balanced understanding of what has happened in that country with an emphasis on the period since Independence was granted in 1980.
Returning to the white settlers, there was always an unfair division of land between whites and blacks. This was accentuated after the Second World War when Rhodesia benefited from an influx of white immigrants. Farming boomed as a result of better equipment, better farming methods and better seeds. The number of white farmers increased from 4,700 in 1945 to 8,600 in 1960, increasing the demand for white occupied land. The black population was also expanding and African grievances over land eventually swelled to voluble protest. This is the background to the land invasions on white farms over the last decade. Mugabe was making good his promise to return the land to his people.
In 1962 Ian Smith’s Rhodesian Front party swept to power on their policy of maintaining the status quo for the white farmers. During the 1960’s Britain was in the process of granting independence to its various colonies. Smith attempted to negotiate independence for Rhodesia but Britain would only accede to this if it was on the basis of democratic (one person, one vote) elections. Smith was intent on entrenching white minority rule “forever”, so Britain refused.

On 11 November 1965 the Smith government made a Unilateral Declaration of Independence which they claimed had precedent in the USA Declaration of Independence in 1776. This triggered a range of reactions. Sanctions were imposed by Britain and the United Nations. The black population was outraged, leading to the formation of black resistance movements aimed at changing the government.
Smith introduced the Law and Order (Maintenance) Act which allowed the government to literally do anything without recourse to the Courts or rule of law. One of his first acts was to imprison four black nationalist leaders without trial or publicity. Mugabe was one of these 4 and he spent the following 11 years in prison. He was released in 1974 during a brief cease fire between the Rhodesian forces and the liberation movements. Mugabe took the opportunity to escape across the border into Mozambique where he became leader of the resistance movement and was instrumental in organizing many terrorist raids on farms in Rhodesia.
The terror war became increasingly vicious on both sides. Rhodesian forces regularly crossed into neighboring territories, dealing brutally with the local population suspected of harboring terrorists. The neighboring countries eventually insisted that a peace deal be consummated. They would no longer tolerate liberation movements on their soil. Mugabe reluctantly agreed. The guerrilla war had spread to all corners of Rhodesia, forcing Smith to also come to the negotiating table.

In early 1980 the country became independent and changed its name to Zimbabwe. Mugabe stunned everyone by gaining 63% of the popular vote at the first elections. Despite claims of vote rigging and intimidation of voters, the numbers were so overwhelming that it was conceded that Mugabe had won and he was elected President of Zimbabwe. People just wanted peace.
Mugabe, despite initial claims of moderation, set about entrenching himself as president, a position he wanted to claim for life. Surprisingly Mugabe did not repeal the Law and Order (Maintenance) Act that the white regime had used to cover its many evil acts. Mugabe relied on its terms to justify the terrible things that he perpetrated over the ensuing 3 decades.

These atrocities are recorded in Martin Meredith’s book “Mugabe” and there is no point detailing them now. Suffice to say that he was bent on eliminating his opponents and intent on punishing anyone who criticized him. His Zanu-PF people infiltrated the army and the police force and were at his beck and call to act as thugs when required. Faithful people were rewarded with a range of patronage that he dispensed.
He found a compliant partner in the Governor of the Reserve bank, which became Mugabe’s source of funds to pay his people and to dispense his patrimony. Needless to say, much of the money came from printing new Zimbabwean dollars, which caused inflation to gradually increase. Finally the army and police forces to got cranky, publicly demanding much higher pay.
The following is extracted from Wikipedia.org:
On 16 February 2006, the governor of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, Gideon Gono, announced that the government had printed ZW$20.5 trillion in order to buy foreign currency to pay off IMF arrears.[51] In early May 2006, Zimbabwe's government announced that they would produce another ZW$60 trillion.[52] The additional currency was required to finance the recent 300% salary increase for soldiers and policemen and 200% increase for other civil servants. The money was not budgeted for the current fiscal year, and the government did not say where it would come from. On 29 May, Reserve Bank officials told IRIN that plans to print about ZW$60 trillion (about US$592.9 million at official rates) were briefly delayed after the government failed to secure foreign currency to buy ink and special paper for printing money.
On 27 June 2007, it was announced that central bank governor Gideon Gono had been ordered by President Robert Mugabe to print an additional ZWD$1 trillion to cater for civil servants' and soldiers' salaries that were hiked by 600% and 900% respectively.[53


Official, black market, and OMIR exchange rates Jan 1, 2001 to Feb 2, 2009. Note the logarithmic scale
Clearly Mugabe was responsible for the hyperinflation. The causes were those always present in these events. A weak economy, large government budget deficits, inability to borrow funds combined with the political decision not to cut Government spending. Governments are reluctant to lay off government employees, especially those related to the armed forces. The latter might invite a military coup. The only source of funding left is the creation of new money.

A very important factor in assessing the current situation is that Mugabe no longer has his own private source of funds to continue with his system of patronage. The army, police force and civil servants are paid by the Unity Government. Mugabe’s power base must be disintegrating rapidly. He has also become very unpopular. It seems unlikely that he could win an election again, even if he managed to get his thugs to resort to intimidation. People identify Tsvangirai and the MDC with the new monetary disposition and the improved economy, while Mugabe is correctly blamed for the trauma of hyperinflation.
There is also the question of sanctions. In recent speeches Mugabe has said that it was time for sanctions against Zimbabwe to be removed. This is nonsense. It is Mugabe and 200 of his associates who are under sanction by the US and other countries under the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act. This prevents them and their families from travelling overseas and freezes their external bank accounts.
This combination of circumstances, combined with the fact that he is 86 years old, suggests that Mugabe must be under pressure to resign. It is a logical deduction that behind the scenes Mugabe must be attempting to negotiate a form of amnesty against prosecution. The next month is important as the SADC, which guaranteed the terms of the recent Unity Government, has given Mugabe until 6 December 2009 to comply with all outstanding issues. Details of developments and current Zimbabwe news can be found at http://www.zimbabwesituation.com/

COMMENTS and CONCLUSIONS.

Having seen the impact of hyperinflation at close quarters, my view is that this is the least desirable method for eliminating excessive debt. The population has been traumatized physically (starvation), mentally and financially. Most people did not have foreign assets or local tangible assets, so lost virtually everything. The companies survived using unusual skills, ignoring laws and protecting working capital by holding foreign currency or purchasing equities.
The alternative option for eliminating excessive debt is to take the tough political decision of allowing ‘too big to fail” companies to fail and accept the unpleasant economic consequences. Excessive Government spending should be curbed. A sound currency, elimination of all rules and controls in a completely free market will produce a much better result in the long term. If this option were adopted, the short term would likely be extremely unpleasant, possibly including an economic depression. It is doubtful whether any Government today has the courage to take this route. Sadly this implies that the world is headed down the path of currency destruction that will eventually result in a Zimbabwean situation for the elimination of debt. Zimbabwe may yet prove to be a role model, demonstrating how rapidly a country can recover from the devastation of hyperinflation and the elimination of debt.
In Zimbabwe the serious problem of the land issue remains to be resolved. Morgan Tsvangirai indicated that security of land tenure was vital.  One option is the Zambian model where all land was nationalized followed by the issue of 99 year leases to property holders. The MDC will also look at some form of compensation for farmers who have been dispossessed. They are anxious to see a land audit set up, but Mugabe is stalling on this for obvious reasons. 
On mining, the MDC are examining a bill that will require concessions to be developed in a shorter period, perhaps 2-3 years, compared to 100 years currently. They will aim at a combination of royalties and taxes to provide the State’s share of mining profits rather than insisting on a percentage of local ownership.

PERSONAL NOTE.

My family was concerned about me going to Zimbabwe. “Don’t you know that it is a dangerous place?” I admit that I was nervous too. International news on Zimbabwe seems to be preoccupied with violence, particularly the brutal land invasions and physical intimidation in the political sphere. The fact that foreign media have not been allowed into the country until the past few months has resulted in a false image being projected. Mugabe’s thugs have closed down newspapers that were critical of his regime, so news has tended to be pro-Mugabe.
We arrived late on a Saturday evening and due to the massive time change, I woke very early on Sunday morning. I decided to take a walk around central Harare and found my way to the Harare Catholic Cathedral. There were Masses in the local language at 7am, 8am, and 9am, followed by an English Mass at 10.00am. All four Masses were standing room only, as can be seen in the photograph below.

Standing room only at four consecutive Masses at the Harare Catholic Cathedral.

The people were well dressed and looked well nourished. They were all friendly and affable. My view that Zimbabwe was a dangerous place did a dramatic about turn. These were peaceable people who wanted nothing but a quiet life. Walking around the streets, I never felt harassed physically. The curio sellers at Victoria Falls were a pain, but so are street vendors everywhere. They were certainly all friendly and intelligent. They could get involved in a serious conversation and all had strong views about economics and politics. Obviously it is Mugabe’s thugs that people fear, but that is becoming less of a problem.
All my preconceived ideas about Zimbabwe were smashed. I now believe it has a bright future, especially once Mugabe leaves the scene. I was sufficiently encouraged by the prospects for the economy and sufficiently impressed by the high quality of the senior executives of major companies to make some small initial personal investments on the Harare Stock Exchange.
Anyone looking for a safe, interesting, place to visit should consider Zimbabwe. I think that you will be pleasantly surprised and have an enjoyable trip.


 By Alf Field    taken from kitco

 Disclosure and Disclaimer Statement: The author is not a disinterested party in that he has personal investments in gold and silver bullion, as well as in gold, silver, uranium and base metal mining shares. The author’s objective in writing this article is to interest potential investors in this subject to the point where they are encouraged to conduct their own further diligent research. Neither the information nor the opinions expressed should be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any stock, currency or commodity. Investors are recommended to obtain the advice of a qualified investment advisor before entering into any transactions. The author has neither been paid nor received any other inducement to write this article.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

A MUST VIEW

SOMETHING I CAME ACROSS



http://video.pbs.org/video/1302794657


Just click on a must view in the header it will save you cutting and pasting the link. I have given the link so you can cut  if you want to forward the clip to someone.

Thursday, October 8, 2009

WHAT THE US NEEDS MOST

JOBS JOBS JOBS AND MORE JOBS


Yep the US needs to really start creating jobs now in order to turn things around. They have fired everything they could at the economy but the Jobs are not showing up yet. I would give them one more quarter before I really start to worry. Not saying that I'm not worried now but when I really worry the sparks usually start to fly in the markets. We usually have a bit of a pick up in the jobs front within the retail sector even in part time jobs around the holiday period but from what I'm seeing most of the big stores are carrying a lot less stock this year so expectations are not good there . Nearly every company that reports earnings are beating their numbers through cuts in jobs and not so much in rising sales.

We have been given the Unemployment number each month and yep it has a trend that is far from a friend nor the truth. The total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate) is 9.8% but when you dig a bit deeper you get a 17% number for total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers.

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm

The Govt while giving out numbers that they can stand behind do give misleading info to us. An example of this is the way they use the birth/death model. They reported last Friday that 263,000 jobs disappeared from the economy during September. But there were around 34,000 extra jobs lost. It's a flawed system and should be flushed down the toilet.

After Friday's report came out, Bloomberg News called Chris Manning, the national benchmark branch chief at the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics, and asked about the 34,000 probably non-existent jobs.

From April 2008 through December, the tax records showed the Labor Department’s figures overestimated payrolls by about 150,000, said Chris Manning, the national benchmark branch chief at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That implies the estimates missed the mark by about 675,000 in the first quarter of this year...

"In this period of steep job losses, the birth/death model didn't work as well as it usually does," Manning told Bloomberg. To the extent that there was an overstatement in the birth/death model, that is likely to still be there. This year alone, this model has added over 700,000 jobs that don't exist to the government's count.

The model added about 184,000 jobs to the payroll total last quarter compared with a 135,000 increase in the same period in 2008, before the financial crisis deepened with the collapse of Lehman Brothers Inc.




Remember Obama said the US could see 10% unemployment. 10% is a killer for the US economy so you don't want anything above it.




So how will the US get going again well the woman above is doing something about a shit situation she found herself in, now the Govt. better get it's finger out and do the same. There is a market for things that last and don't break believe it or not. How someone could make so much money from something that lets you down almost every day is beyond me (Microsoft) an example.






The Govt. should kick start research and development in a coordinated way with all the major players contributing in each field they work in. They should have a New Ideas Project set up. Get all the big companies singing from the same hymn sheet.
There is a big world out there in need of many simple things like water, energy, food, drugs and so on. There are plenty of innovative ideas that can be brought forward into today's world to make it a better place to live in. We have all heard of things that are suppose to have been held back by companies because it would kill their existing products, well they should have a big think about perhaps producing them.
The Govt. should review a lot of it's red tape surrounding start ups, I say give people the chance to fail at least some will succeed. Give all the help they can, even have tax free for newly employed that have been out of work for over a certain time period so as not to have people giving up their jobs for the new ones with the benefits. A person working is way more valuable than one getting social security benefits even if they don't pay taxes. Most of the big companies out there are sitting on vast amounts of cash and it needs to be prised from their hands in a way that they could benefit.There is a wealth of qualified people and ideas out there wasting away. Jobs is the main cure for today's ills.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

OOPS SOMETHING IS BROKEN


.9% DAY

That was the day that was in it. The Dow , Cac, Dax and FTSE all closed up the same .9%.

Well that wasn't exactly the full story as the S&P closed up 1.01% and the Nasdaq gained 1.3%. This rise was after the main index's fell for two days by around 3%. I was hoping for a follow through on yesterdays falls but alas it didn't happen. I wouldn't be to worried though as I felt the markets lacked any drive and feel safe with my small short position. I think that the retail business is still weak and shows the vulnerability of this so called recovery.





Stocks rallied today based on consumer hopes ha ha I say, Home Depot reported earnings .66 cents compared to .77 last year along with Target's 79 cents per share versus 82 cents. Target came in higher than expected due to cost cutting and also said they thought that the recovery was stalling. Revenue and same-store sales slipped, as consumers remained cautious. Shares gained 6%. WMT closed down at 51.32 close to the low end of their trading range which was 51.24 - 51.85 having opened at 51.64. I wouldn't be buying retail yet as I think it has a bit to prove just yet. There are around 300k people in the US that have availed of the clunckers for cash who didn't have a car payment and now do. This is money out of the system on big one off buys that have years of repayments ahead of them. Many of the retail stocks have had a very big run and in my humble opinion along with the banks will see a pullback .


I expect HPQ will drag down the Nasdaq tomorrow, the company said it expected revenue to decline between 4 percent and 5 percent. The weak demand for personal computers and printer ink has seen Hewlett-Packard (HP) report a 19% fall in quarterly profit. Sales growth of its software business fell even further from the previous quarter. Revenue and profit margins of its personal computer business may be getting hurt by the popularity of the low-cost netbooks
The world's top PC marker said that net profit totalled $1.64bn in the three months ended 31 July, down from $2.03bn in the same quarter a year ago. HP closed at $43.96 on the New York Stock Exchange, and fell to $43.09 in extended trading. It's still trading as I type and had touched a low of 42.95. Overall the story is not what I would expect of a recovery.


Shares of Analog Devices Inc crashed 5.6 percent to $25.83 after the closing bell on Tuesday after the semiconductor equipment maker released third-quarter results.

It's a funny old world really , it's the computer industry that took the jobs from so many people and although it created many jobs it never will replace enough to make the world go round . A job killer industry that we cant live without. You can eat chips but not the micro ones. You cant have consumers without jobs and without jobs you can't have recovery. A millionaire last year was a two bit player . Today he's a millionaire ......
DID YOU KNOW......
A barrel of oil is currently $68 a barrel . If you got the retail market price for the same barrel filled with HP best quality ink you would pay around $300,000

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monday, August 17, 2009

BLACK MONDAY ANYONE ?????




Monday, August 17, 2009
Black Monday??????

THE ROAR OF THE BEAR
Futures down heavy as investors pull in their horns amid growing worry about strength of global recovery. Asia, Hong Kong's Hang Seng dived nearly 5%. Major markets in Europe were all down about 2% in morning trading. And this on the news that Japan is the latest country to emerge from its worst recession since the end of the second world war, recording its first quarter of growth for more than a year amid a rise in exports. Japan saw it's GDP rise at an annualised rate of 3.7% in the April-June period, and by 0.9% from the previous three months. Exports rose 6.3% from the previous quarter. But Analysts have warned that this recovery could evaporate as it was a home based stimulus package handout that helped things. Some of the benefits came through cash handouts to all residents - those, together with subsidies for the fuel-efficient cars and green electrical appliances . Unemployment is at a six-year high of 5.4% and could rise to a record 5.8% next year. There is a strong fear that if spending slows or stops things could turn for the worst fast. I feel that the spending could easly stop as people may have bought all the discounted goods they need for some time. We saw a rise in oil and steel prices due to restocking of inventory but will we see the market buy up the new stock as quick as last time. I think not.






The Chinese market is off 17% from it's high on the 4th Aug





Jobs still in my view is key to the recovery. While I have been away for a month on holidays I did hear that the job losses had improved in the US but still down. The US needs to be creating 250k jobs to keep even. Where are those jobs going to come from in the near future . I just cant see it happening for some time.





The stimulus packages have had some success but I fear another round will do more harm than good. It is better for the world to find a level to work off than a pumped up false floor.






I'm still a bear , down on tza about $20k but have made progress trading over the last couple of days. I am still 95% cash and won't be entering any long positions bar a shot or two at the odd bounce for a 2 min trade.




I think the long term price of oil could be higher but think it will come under big pressure short term and could see $45 in Oct a month I hate. The stock markets will dictate the oil price also the $ which will rise before it eventually gets hammered.



Gold is a buy at $850. Silver is in my view better value than gold and may be the better long term hold.


Will the s&p see the March lows ............ I think yes easy.

Read my dislaimer below.

Friday, July 10, 2009

SUN SEA COCKTAILS MUSIC AND MY BOAT


















Off on my holidays .


I wont be blogging for a month .











Wednesday, July 8, 2009

ALUMINUM AND OIL SIGNS OF THE FUTURE



Well Alcoa brought us the awaited numbers and beat the St. in sales and profits . Sales fell 41% to $4.24 billion from $7.62 billion last year, beating analyst expectations of $3.93 billion. The aluminum giant said it lost 26 cents a share last quarter, better than the 38 cents expected, despite the 41% drop in sales from 2008. This is their third consecutive quarterly loss reported .


The company said the average price of aluminum on the London Metal Exchange in the second quarter was $1,485 per tonne, a 9% increase from the first quarter of 2009, but a 49 % decrease from the second quarter of 2008. No doubt they have been hit hard with the downturn their big markets of building and construction, aerospace, and the motor industry. They showed the better than expected results partly due to Job cuts, by cutting their divi and cutting spending also by raising $1.3b.
The big killer for the company is that cut in the price of aluminum.
The Juruti bauxite mine in Brazil and the Alumar alumina refining upgrade and expansion are both in the process of being commissioned. The first shipment of bauxite from Juruti is expected within the next 90 days.

Chuck Bradford an analyst at Affiliated Research Group said "Results were better than expected due to improved costs, In the last several days it became pretty clear that Alcoa was going to do much better on the cost side than we had thought."
He cautioned, however, that the report, which is generally viewed as a bellwether for the broader economy, should not be taken as a sign of a strong earnings season.
"Alcoa's numbers really have no relation to anybody else or the economy," Bradford said. "It's strictly a matter of worldwide metal supply and demand and the savings Alcoa achieved in cost were purely company related."

The shares traded up in AH trading and are currently at 10.12 as I type having hit 10.35. A lot will depend on their guidance in the conference call which will be tonight 8th July.
HANDY LINKS:

I wouldn't be overly enthusiastic with these results but the company is trying hard to keep on top of things in these hard times.






In other news we saw that Consumers trimmed borrowing in May for the fourth straight month as the recession took another bite out of investments and drove unemployment higher. According to a report in the AP The Federal Reserve said Wednesday that consumer credit fell at an annual rate of 1.5 percent, or by $3.2 billion, from April. Economists expected a deeper cut of $9.5 billion.

But the new figures still mark the latest move by consumers to curb borrowing, pay down debt and strengthen household budgets. Americans have been spending less and saving more to cope with the recession, which started in December 2007 and is the longest since World War II.
The savings rate jumped to 6.9 percent in May, the highest since December 1993. The amount of money saved — $768.8 billion — was the most on records that started in January 1959, the government recently reported.




Also in the news was the UK is heading for an "energy crunch" after new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea dropped 57pc in the first half of this year. A report by Oil & Gas UK, the industry group, showed that companies are cutting back on new projects as costs rise and funding is scarce during the recession.
Investment in the industry fell to £4.8bn last year, down £1.2bn over the last two years, and it could drop below £3bn next year. The report estimates that £5bn a year is needed to maintain exploration.
In a report from Bloomberg
Venezuela oil and natural-gas drilling slowed to a five-year low in June after the country’s state oil company deferred payments to service providers, spurring rig shutdowns in the South American country that was the fourth-biggest source of U.S. crude-oil imports last year.
Oil rig use fell to 58 from 63 in the previous month, while natural-gas drillers kept using three rigs, according to figures released today by Baker Hughes Inc., the world’s third-largest oilfield-services company, which tracks drilling worldwide. The combined total is the lowest since October 2004.
Drillers are shutting down after Venezuela’s state oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela SA, failed to pay its bills for as long as a year. The prospect that a U.S. recession will further erode oil demand has prompted companies worldwide to reduce drilling investments, said Fadel Gheit, an analyst at Oppenheimer & Co.
“Everything in the oil business has been skidding for the last seven to eight months,” he said today in a telephone interview from New York. “Not only is demand not going to grow, but demand will decline in the next five years.”
Oil won’t return to its record level of $147.27 a barrel reached in July 2008, he said.


In a separate report Crude oil fell for a sixth day, the longest losing streak since December, and gasoline tumbled to a two-month low after a report showed a bigger-than-expected gain in U.S. fuel supplies as the recession curbed demand.
Gasoline stockpiles climbed 1.9 million barrels to 213.1 million in the week ended July 3, more than twice the increase forecast in a Bloomberg News survey, the Energy Department said. Inventories of distillate fuel, a category that includes heating oil and diesel, rose to the highest since 1985 as consumption dropped to a 10-year low.
“The market is starting to focus on the weak fundamentals,” said Antoine Halff, head of energy research at Newedge USA LLC in New York. “The deterioration of the fundamentals should continue in the weeks ahead. The drop in prices has yet to run its course.”
Crude oil for August delivery fell $2.79, or 4.4 percent, to $60.14 a barrel at 2:42 p.m. on the New York Mercantile Exchange, the lowest settlement since May 19. Prices have dropped 16 percent in the past six days.
Gasoline for August delivery declined 9.95 cents, or 5.7 percent, to $1.6333 a gallon in New York, the lowest settlement since May 6. It was the biggest one-day drop since March 30.

Distillate Supplies
Distillate fuel inventories rose 3.74 million barrels to 158.7 million, the biggest gain since January, the report showed. The increase left supplies last week 30 percent higher than the five-year average for the period.
Gasoline inventories were forecast to increase 900,000 barrels last week, according to the median of 16 responses in a Bloomberg News survey. Supplies of distillate fuel were estimated to rise 1.83 million barrels.
Total U.S. daily fuel demand averaged 18.4 million barrels in the past four weeks, down 5.9 percent from a year earlier, the report showed. Distillate consumption fell 12 percent to 3.27 million over the period, the lowest since July 1999.
“The distillate demand numbers just look awful,” said Tim Evans, an energy analyst with Citi Futures Perspective in New York. “There’s a double-digit year-on-year decline in demand because of the economy. If GM isn’t making cars, they aren’t shipping them, either.”
Crude Oil Inventories
Crude oil inventories fell 2.9 million barrels to 347.3 million last week, the lowest since January, the report showed. Supplies last week were 7.4 percent higher than the five-year average, according to the department.
“This report is incredibly bearish,” Evans said. “The drop in crude-oil stocks isn’t that important because total petroleum stocks keep rising.”

To read the full report go to http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a3K2HPWe2JIo

OPEC Expects Demand for Its Crude in 2013 to Be Below Last Year .

The vix for oil is showing a high level of uncertainty among investors as efforts intensify for stronger regulation of energy trading. This measure is a relatively recent addition to the CBOE. Oil VIX Ticker - OVX tracks the United States Oil Fund ETF (NYSEArca:USO - News).


All very bearish there.







Well today I traded the big shorts FAZ & TZA it was a shorts dream day and I switched for the inevitable end of day pop to FAS. It's nice of Uncle Sam to throw us a few $'s each day like this.




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

A FEW THINGS TO WATCH AND THINK ABOUT







Today we saw weakness in the market. There were a number of reasons for this. First one that I saw was the Nasdaq which closed down 2.31% at 1746.17. This was helped by MSFT which was down 2.9% Dell off 3.1% Goog off 3.2% at $396.63 yep under the $400 . There were many Tech stocks down emc, cien, intc, in fact hard to find a winner there. This was mostly down to worries about spending may fall by as much as 6/7% this year in what are essentially growth companies . Yes spending down in one of the big O's targeted areas to help the economy . Of course there is the talk of how much these stocks had run and were due a bit of a pullback . By now you will be aware about my thinking of the run, it was at least in part manufactured . There really is no interest in the market at the moment from investors. This can be clearly seen by the Vol. of late. No one is willing to take any kind of long term view at these levels and most think we will see lower levels again sooner or later.
Another reason for the fall today was the uncertainty about earnings from the big industrials with Alcoa AA giving their numbers after the bell tomorrow Wed. The number is expected to come in low. Their ceo announced today that the future is looking better with China looking like it's leading the way out of this slump. I worry when you hear things are not so bad before you get earnings from a company. A kind of soften the blow so to say.
There was a bit of a worry for some traders of UNG which was trading up till it was halted during the day. It finally got trading again but closed down around 3% at $12.18 It's not one I follow, but the news was about them looking for regulatory approval to issue 1 bln new units. What I hear you say more shares they must have more shareholders than shares lol. Well joking aside here is a couple of links to the story.
Oil had a nasty slip today too with Crude oil falling to a six-week low. No one is buying at the moment as demand has fallen with inventories showing a rise last week. Here is a link for the weekly numbers . http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/weekly_petroleum_status_report/wpsr.html
Again I see reports of people saying it's needs to pullback a bit. “The price fall looks like a needed correction to the market,” Simon Wardell, energy research manager at Global Insight Inc. in London, said today on Bloomberg radio. “The oil market doesn’t reflect spot conditions, it reflects the expectation of conditions, and those change very quickly.”
The $ is in the news quite a bit and is been traded at 1.39 with the € as I type.
Credit card loan delinquencies also increased, rising to 4.75% from 4.52% in the last quarter of 2008.
The US unemployment rate is now at a 25-year high of 9.4%.
Debt Burden Quickens Power Shift as G-8 Loses Clout

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aEVdnjdCm1W0

Yep overall I'm quite confident in this market. Of course you have to be on the right side of the fence .

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]